Meet Jake Elstone

Although little more than a child, Jake Elstone has big dreams.  He got into ‘politics’ a couple of years ago when he followed his cousin, Paul Golding into the family business and became a fascist. From his early Biffer beginnings as a glorified Britain First tea boy he quickly rose through (or rather bypassed) the ranks to become part of the Biffers’ laughable National Executive Committee. This is the nerve centre of British fascism, the operational HQ of the party that wants to take our country back from whoever they think might have stolen it. The committee includes such intellectual heavyweights as Steve “Pieman” Lewis, John “Nazi” Percivaldi and of course Paul “Der Fuhrer” Golding himself. With that sort of intellectual pedigree on offer young Jake should fit right in.

So far as IQ goes he’s ranked somewhere between ‘Walt wrangler’, Robin Lomax and ‘Intelligence officer’, Paul Besser. That just about puts him on a par with BF ‘Chief of Facebook’, Anthony Blunn (along with most of the planet’s microbial population). With this sort of genius leading the operation it’s no wonder that the rest of London’s candidates are so frightened. And make no mistake – they are frightened.

We know they are because Jake’s ‘cuz’ told us so – repeatedly at demonstrations across the land (until he had to answer bail because he’d been naughty).

Undeterred, young Jake has put himself forward (along with several relatives and most of his Aunty Christine’s neighbours) as a candidate for the London Assembly.

Far be it from us here at Exposing Britain First to criticise a young man in his early twenties for having ambition. We think it’s good and Cousin Fuhrer must be very proud of him and cousin Nancy for taking on such massive odds. But we do wonder what the presence of so many of Golding’s mother’s offspring and neighbours means for ‘the only party to confront Islamic extremism’.

London’s a big place with literally millions of people eligible to stand as candidates for its prestigious assembly.

Is this really the best they could do? Maybe Bexley just has an unusually high incidence of political masterminds, most of whom seem regularly to enjoy a nice cup of tea and a chocolate digestive round at ‘Nazi Christine’s’ house.

Perhaps they’re not quite as popular in the capital as they’d have us believe.

When politics goes bad

We’ve all heard about political dirty tricks.

We’ve all been scandalised by reports of underhand attempts by tin-pot fascists in banana republics to silence political opponents. We’ve all become used to the principles of representative democracy in which people of all political persuasions are able to get their message out to let the public decide.

In a democracy it doesn’t matter that we disagree – we still have to respect the right of other people to say their piece. Of course there are limits to that. We’re not allowed to incite racial or religious hatred, for example but we can still say what we mean.

Imagine what it would be like if a British political party ignored those hard-won British democratic values and tried to silence their political opponents. Imagine if they did so covertly as though they were some sort of quasi-military intelligence unit conducting ‘black ops’. How would that fit with traditional British values of fair play?

Over the last ten years or so British citizens have changed the way they participate in politics. No longer do we sit passively in front of our TVs or quietly accept newspaper editorials as though they somehow have a monopoly on political thinking. We use social media. This generation, more than any other before it has the ability to discuss, to dissent, to promote and to debate across the political spectrum. And our political opportunities are so much the better as a result.

Imagine if a political party took it upon itself to decide who should or should not have access to social media. To decide who can and who cannot be heard in British democracy. There’d be an outcry – and rightly so.

But, of course – that could never happen here…. or could it?

Well – actually, yes. There is a registered political party operating in Britain that’s trying to do just that. And they’re doing it by underhand means. They even give their covert activities the feel of a military operation, dressing up their dishonest attempts to subvert the freedom of expression of British citizens with terms like ‘intelligence’ or ‘operation’.

Even more hypocritically, they are setting up false accounts intended to complain about other, genuinely legitimate activists whom they falsely accuse of having created false accounts. They even issued instructions to their ‘operatives’ on how to create seemingly plausible fake accounts, known as ‘sock puppets’. The fact that these instructions are laughably superficial and would result in obviously fake accounts isn’t the point. The intention is clear.

And it’s not hard to understand why they’re doing this. They’ve tried silencing their political opponents in other ways already and although they’ve had some success it’s really not been very effective. As much as anything else their attempts to make people ‘go away’ through face to face intimidation or via Email and postal threats have just made them a laughing stock. This ‘political party’ is now understood by all but its most blinkered supporters to be nothing more than a bunch of thugs trying to mask their white supremacist agenda behind real politics. They promote a bizarre definition of ‘Britishness’ that none but the most racist nationalists recognize at all.

So they’re trying a different tack – one that they naively suppose might be more subtle than out and out, in your face aggression. But once again, they’ve got it wrong. Once again they’re just showing themselves up for the undemocratic, unBritish, unpatriotic, unreasonable and uneducated buffoons they really are.

What would you think of a registered political party that so ignored traditional British values of democracy and free expression? What would you say about such a party if it tried to convince you that it was concerned about preserving British values? What would you think of a political organisation that just tries to silence political opposition rather than debate with its detractors?

We know how we’d describe them.

We’d describe them as ‘Fascists’.

They describe themselves as ‘Britain First’!

Hat tip…

EBF gratefully acknowledges the HM Armed Forces past and present that do not like Britain First community for bringing this ‘intelligence’ fiasco to our attention. That’s what happens when real servicemen and women take an interest in tin pot Nazis who merely  dream of playing soldiers on social media. There really isn’t any contest.

It’s truly impressive for a paramilitary style intelligence organisation to find itself infiltrated on its first weekend of operations, isn’t it?

No?

We didn’t think so either.