A view from a barstool #30 by Landlord

Beer 2Hangovers over, empty champagne bottles in the re cycling and cocktail sausages back in the fridge, the celebrations are over and it’s back to work for the admins of Exposing Britain First. The news of the past week has been received by all of us, and you I expect, with high fives and a sense of relief, but it ain’t over till it’s over and we need to keep up the pressure on Goldibollocks, Screechy and the shit troopers until the book is not only thrown at them, but lodged in their collective arses.

The news firstly that Screechy pled not guilty didn’t come as much of a surprise although if it was me then plead guilty pick up a fine, maybe a suspended sentence, and a few stringent conditions, but job done and get back to being a racist. But that’s not the biffer way. How else will they be able to raise money from their mostly fanatical disciples, to show themselves martyrs to their frankly racist cause. EBF’s own BF Jayda Fransen rantingfriendly legal eagle reckons instead of playing a blinder, Jayda, by playing it to the end game could be looking at time inside. Firstly, she cannot plead not guilty to wearing political uniform, Goldibollocks buggered that up for her by playing a blinder. Secondly, breaching bail conditions, again by publicly ripping up her bail conditions in front of her fawning sheeple, she showed total contempt for the courts. The final charge of racial harrassment seems to be tied up. Our legal bods say that there has to be fairly irrefutable evidence before the CPS will prosecute for racially aggravated harrasment. There again, what does a Pub Landlord know? I guess only time will tell.

Then the news that my liver hated more than myself. Biffer High Command would not fight Beds Police and the conditions imposed on them. Goldibollocks appeared on another tedious video, trying desperately to put a spin on the fact the biffers aren’t allowed in Luton, aren’t allowed to set foot in a Mosque anywhere in England and Wales amongst others. They did this so they wouldn’t have to pay any costs which could “literally cost faaaaaasands of paaaands.” Even though they were advised not to by their ambulance chasing solicitors, I suspect that their zombie like supporters raised just over £3k and not the amount they wanted. So EBF will keep flagging up any breaches that they will inevitibly do.

Golding never surrender nse nfse ocs.png

When our friendly biffer trolls come over a regular charge is that we are Muslim appeasers, that we condone terrorism. After yawning copiously we state that we are against all forms of bigotry and therefore the news that Anjem Choudary was found guilty had us reaching for the champagne flutes again. This venom filled, hate spitting criminal, spouting ‘the gospel’ according to him and not what the 99.9% of Muslims believe, has finally ran out of lives and is looking like he will be doinga spell at her Majesty’s pleasure. Do you see any similarities? We do. In fact we always have. Two cheeks of the same arse!

There you have it in a nutshell. A great week for anti bigotry, and the news that Joshua Bonehill is up in front of the beak for yet another race crime has my liver packing it’s bags and telling me to bugger off.

Toodlepip

We’re not the PC police

In a recent post I referred to Fuhrer Golding as ‘The fat controller’, in reference to the station master from the ‘Thomas the Tank Engine’ series of children’s books. This was one of several tongue in cheek references to ‘der Fuhrer’ in a short post that was very definitely intended to laugh at the pompous would-be leader of the ‘Master race’. 

A few of EBF’s Facebook commenters have objected to my reference to him being ‘fat’. Presumably they’ve fallen for the superficial, stereotypical view of anti-fascists propounded by the far-right. So please allow me to explain…

I do not represent the thought police. Nor am I particularly interested in presenting a politically correct veneer in my writing. I oppose fascism and neo-nazism. That doesn’t mean I go around censoring myself all the time. It just means I oppose neonazism and fascism.
I believe my predecessor might have been a little more careful in this respect but I’m not her. Nor do I agree (as one commenter suggested) that editorial humour makes me as bad as those who would torture and exterminate whole swathes of the population for being the ‘wrong’ colour, religion or political persuasion.

EBF exists to combat fascism. We do find some insults unacceptable, particularly those pertaining to disabilities or ethnic groups but we’re not the thought police and we do have a sense of humour.

Sorry about that.

Marcia

Britain First is Folding under Golding (The brave)

​Some Britain First antics are just too funny for words. Who can forget the sight of those brave, uniformed Biffers being chased away by children during the infamous ‘Battle of Hexthorpe’? Who could keep a straight face as RCO Lewis fearlessly leafletted a town on tiptoes in the middle of the night? And now…

Who among us could fail to collapse in fits of laughter as Fuhrer Golding reports on how he and Jayda just made a pig’s ear out of a… pig’s ear?
This fantastic video shows the fat controller desperately trying to put a positive spin on the Biffers’ most humiliating defeat so far. They didn’t even have the balls to go down fighting in court. These green-jacketed guardians of medieval Christianity and the Crusading spirit turned and fled the moment things started to get just a little bit dicey.

The latest stunning tactical coup from Britain First involves them conceding every point on the injunction against them out of court. They’ve just agreed without a fight to a total of seven far-reaching restrictions that not only ban them from Luton for 3 years but also from every Mosque in England & Wales for the same period. They are banned from posting images of any person filmed or photographed in Luton AND from inciting racial or religiously motivated harassment.

In short – they’ve rolled over, spread their metaphorical legs, closed their collective eyes and begun thinking really, really hard about anything but England.

The video is entertaining throughout if you like watching der Fuhrer tie himself up in knots trying to spin this in a positive light for the sheeple. But the best bit comes at the end when Golding rhetorically asks just what might prevent other police forces from doing the exact same thing. His answer to that question is priceless…

“Nothing!”

And that just about sums up the impact Britain First will have on British history…

Nothing!

Biffers bested by Bedfordshire Bobbies

Britain First have managed to get their own way for once…

The Britain First manifesto is a document that they shamelessly copied from Adolf Hitler himself in the shape of the German NSDAP’s 25 point plan. It calls for consequences for all those who knowingly publish lies to mislead the public. Today they learned just how attentive the British legal system has been to their plagiarised demands.

BBC3 BF WWOCB Barstool combo banner high court

The High Court delivered a ruling today that extends Fransen and Golding’s ban from Luton for a further 3 years. That might seem like small potatoes at first glance but it really isn’t. It’s a precedent in law that can only be overturned by appeal to the judicial chamber of the House of Lords, The Supreme Court or, ironically enough, the European Court of Human Rights.

In the absence of such appeals which take a lot of time and money to mount there’s a handy precedent available to local authorities and police forces all across the UK to have the Biffers banned from their areas.  There seems to be nothing now remaining to prevent similair actions from other Biffer targets like Rochdale, Rotherham, Dover, Gillingham and the rest.

Even better, depending upon the exact nature of future demonstrations, Fuhrer Golding and Frau Fransen might have scuppered the whole demo set up for other fash groups like Pegida and the English Defence League. They were already hated by the rest of British fascism. Now they’ll be total pariahs!

Well done Bedfordshire police. We salute you!

A view from a barstool #29 by Landlord

Beer 2I’m back, a few weeks away as my business took off and no time to watch,listen and take the piss out of all things biffer.

Whilst I’ve been away there have been numerous opportunities for them to post their bile and islamophobic nonsense. Brexit, whether you voted for it or not, seems to have given the green light for the unsavoury few to carry out nasty, racial attacks. The murders in mainline Europe seem to, in biffer minds anyway, have got the Islam haters in a tizz and want to start a civil war, despite the fact that France, America et al are bombing the shit outof civilians in Aleppo and elsewhere whilst the true ememy, Daesh sit around laughing while the biffers and Western Governments do their propoganda for them. British armed police alongside G4S are ready for them. I trust our police, just, but G4S, I don’t trust them to even read my electricity meters.

As I watched from afar, the biffers have gone on a camping trip, which although very funny, was also quite sinister. Screechy was strangely quiet, but more about her later, Goldibollocks has gone into full begging mode, and the rest of the shittroopers and high command have had their racist routines curtailed by the exasperated police forces.

Goldibollocks has been in court. He says he has pulled a blinder, instead he has basically fucked the Biffer high command over. He came out and produced a triumphant video telling his sheeple that he had completely put the CPS into a frenzy by pleading guilty. No, Goldibollocks, you haven’t. You now have a conviction, however you want to dress it up, and a criminal record to boot. Also if any of the shit troopers and high command go out on their leaflet days with hoodies etc, the Police now know they can arrest them and point to the guilty plea by Der Fuhrer and Jims your uncle…….conviction.

BF Goldong stitch up court jayda fransen magistrates charges.png

As I write this on Friday afternoon, Screechy is probably having her case heard in Luton. Now in her case there is more to it than Goldibollocks having three specific charges against her.

  • Charge one, wearing political uniform. Now I’m no legal eagle but if Goldibollocks pled guilty there is no way Screechy can go not guilty.
  • Charge two, failing to surrender to bail conditions. Not guilty she says, but again how can she. In one of her memorable video’s she ripped up her ail conditions and said she would no longer sign on, how she can plead not guilty to this is beyond me.
  • Charge three, racial aggravation, again not guilty she says. Even a heavily edited biffer video can see Screechyis the aggressor, flanked by her bodyguards(who to me are hilarious fucknuggets) openly intimidating Muslims going about a shopping trip.

If the biffers think that they were the only ones who are allowed to make videos then they are even bigger fuckwits than I think they are, this and the fact we live ina country with the largest amount of CCTV camera’s in Europe, you would think that this may have made her think again. According to friends that are in the know on legal matters, the CPS have to have an overwhelming amount of evidence before beinging the case to court.

With my small amount of legal knowledge, fighting this case is pretty futile. If Screechy pulls a “blinder” and pleads guilty she gets away with a fine and a suspended jail sentence, but if she does that police forces and councils around the country can apply for the same banning orders as Beds Police. If she pleads not guilty, and goes to crown court, not only is there a possibility of jail time, there is also a possibility of being held on remand.

Whatever they decide watch out for begging letters, video’s and buckets.

Finally before I go and change a barrel, the biffers triumphant roadshow went to Coventry last week, and a massive 25 patriots turned up. Take off Screechy and Goldibollocks along with thier shittroopers a total of about 12 were there. They are alledgedly turning up in Cardiff soon. They may call it a roadshow but I like to refer to it as a game of musical chairs.

Toodlepip,

Landlord

Unanswered questions about Jayda’s bail conditions

It’s no secret that I was disappointed at the outcome of yesterday’s hearing at Luton Magistrates’ Court. I had hoped that Jayda Fransen would be remanded in custody, given her previous failure to comply with bail conditions until she appeared in Crown Court. I really wanted this destructive harridan removed from the public sphere right away even if the result would be a reduction of sentence for ‘time served’ when she is finally sentenced by the Crown. Unfortunately, that was not to be. But what did actually happen?

BF Jayda Fransen after luton magistrates court august 5th 2016We only have Jayda’s own account of the outcome and, as usual with Britain First’s pronouncements, the brief video statement she released from the back of a car as she left the court left more questions than answers.

What was the reason for the delay? Fransen helpfully explained that she couldn’t report from outside the courthouse because of the hordes of Muslims driving aggressively up to her in cars. This is odd for several reasons.

Firstly – our spotters on the ground report that there was no sign of any aggressive or erratic driving. In fact there was a bit of a traffic jam which would have made it quite impossible.

Secondly – Luton Magistrates Court doesn’t open out onto a main road so she could easily have given the piece to camera from the steps without any chance of motorised interference.

Thirdly – and perhaps most tellingly – there’s no Britain First video of these hordes of motorised Muslims.

Britain First videos everything they think might make useful propaganda. If Fransen really was being harassed and intimidated by hordes of Muslims Paul and his ‘security team’ who were present throughout and certainly equipped to record video would have filmed them and published the evidence within minutes. There is, as yet no such evidence online. Come on Britain First – here’s a direct challenge for you… produce the evidence. Prove our spotters wrong.

But the whereabouts of the missing evidence isn’t the only unanswered question…

In the past Britain First has published every single bail sheet pertaining to its activities in the hope of demonstrating some mythical persecution by the ‘Muslim-appeasing’ (read ‘not Islamophobic’) establishment. So where’s Jayda’s?

We know that she’s not allowed back to Luton at least until November but what else is on this elusive bail sheet?

Why the relative silence regarding this case on the Britain First website? Apart from a single brief video from Fransen herself there’s been no new publications about the case and nothing from Jayda herself at all. There was one old video posted from February 2016 featuring Paul and Jayda in their ‘makeshift command centre’ (sic) but no further mention of the current case at all. This is very unusual and leads us to speculate that there may well be a social media component to the bail conditions preventing her from doing anything more than make that single report on the outcome of yesterday’s hearing.

Of course- we really don’t know. But if Jayda’s telling the truth then there’s no reason for the Biffers to hold back, is there?

So come on, Britain First- do what you usually do and publish a jpeg of the signed bail conditions. Nobody cares if you want to block out Jayda’s address. We all know her address and postcode anyway. We knew where she lived even before she pretended to be moving out for the benefit of the BBC. We still knew where she lived when she published that same address in respect of the London Assembly elections earlier this year (by which time she should have been long gone) and we still know her address now.

So by all means, blank it out – it makes no difference to us. That’s not what matters. Instead we challenge you to demonstrate that the bail conditions really are as Fransen said they were. Until you do that we will continue to speculate about their true conditions, based upon your own real world and social media activities. It shouldn’t be too hard to work them out, more or less by watching what happens (or doesn’t happen) next.

Are you nervous yet, Jayda?

It’s been a long day here at the EBF office. Landlord made a welcome appearance after a forced absence dealing with business issues. After ensuring the fridge was cold enough for the champagne he’d donated in case Fransen got remanded he busied himself penning an account of recent events for the blog. That goes out on Sunday morning so remember to check back then.

The rest of us could barely contain ourselves. Kit and I seemed to regress back in time to do very passable impressions of our former excitable schoolgirl selves. One or two of the guys spent the day pacing up and down until Foxy was convinced they’d wear a little path in the carpet. Prole stood silently for hours staring out over the magnificent London cityscape from our high-rise office, occasionally seeming to squeal with anticipated delight at the prospect of Britain First’s imminent demise.

London from the EBF office

We speculated amongst ourselves about what might happen. Would Jayda ‘pull a blinder’ and get away with a fine? Would she deny everything and be remanded in custody? Would the magistrates give her 6 months (the maximum sentence they’re able to dispense) and leave it at that.

We all agreed that the only thing we really wanted to happen was a referral to Crown Court. Anything else would be a bonus but a hearing in the Crown Court was essential. That’s where the really heavy duty sentences come from and so that’s what we wanted to happen.

And then… a little after 4pm the news broke. No remand (oh well) but she’d pleaded not guilty and is indeed off to Crown Court on November 2nd and 3rd 2016. Not only that her new bail conditions forbid her from entering Luton at all until the hearing. Marvellous.

BF Jayda Fransen after luton magistrates court august 5th 2016.png

Personally, I won’t pretend I’m not disappointed to see her walk free. I’d have preferred to see Fransen remanded in custody on the grounds that she tore up her last bail conditions but as Prole pointed out – that’s just a detail. We got what we were really hoping for. Jayda’s going to have to face serious criminal charges in a serious criminal court. So it’s all good. And the stupid mare actually seems to think that this is a Britain First victory!

For the record, by the way our spotters in Luton tell us that there were no Muslim hordes harassing Jayda at all. It’s more likely the delay in her report was due to Fransen needing to compose herself after a particularly frightening day in court. For all her online bravado even Jayda must realise how great is the risk of custody, especially now that she’s pleaded not guilty.

We’ll let you know how this situation develops, of course but so far so good.