The Lord’s army – Onward Christian soldiers!

BF the lords army troublesThis image appeared over at Biffer Towers (Britain First’s Facebook page) overnight last night. In all honesty we were a little intrigued to know just which Lord and who the army was planning to fight.

Was it YHWH?

Was it Jehovah?

Was it ‘God’?

We were pretty sure it wasn’t Allah.

Looking at some of the Biffer imagery a few people even thought it might be Odin or Thor.

Eventually all became clear. It’s the Protestant God of the Ulster Unionists.

BF flags ulster unionist troubles

Britain First has gone all Irish Unionist again. Jim Dowson’s influence seems to be growing stronger from his hiding place behind Paul’s mother’s sofa.

We wonder how many Biffers realise just how much support they’re lending to the Irish ‘troubles’.

Of course we’ve always known that the Biffers real aim is to start a civil war (or Holy war as Uncle Jim likes to describe it). They’ve never made any secret of that. Usually though their target ‘out group’ for this conflict is the Muslim community. Looking at recent posts from Biffer Towers it appears that they harbour equally violent intentions toward Roman Catholics.

We have to wonder… do the Biffers know (or even care) who they hate or is it just that they’re looking for any excuse for a scrap?

A group of bloodthirsty loose cannons such as this who seem capable of turning their hatred against just about anyone is hardly a suitable role model for social cohesion. On the contrary, Britain First is destructive, bloodthirsty, hate-filled and totalitarian.

Now where have Europeans seen something like that before?

nuremberg rally

The rules of the game

Today David Cameron gave a speech. It wasn’t just any old speech. It was a speech intended to jump on the Islamophobic bandwagon (not that he’s ever really been ‘off the wagon’).

EBF Cameron divisive extremism speech the rules

When Team EBF read about it we despaired. This speech is just another blatant attempt to pander to the petty xenophobia and Islamophobia that pervades British society. What could he be playing at?

We’re sure that other people will have wondered the same thing. So we thought we’d try to identify the rules of this divisive game.

The rules of the game (Divide and rule)

The game involves two teams

Team 1 is called ‘us’

Team 2 is called ‘them’

Team 1 players (us) are allowed to know the rules

Team 2 players (them) are not allowed to know the rules (it’s a rule)

Whatever the score Team 1 (us) always wins

Most players start the game in team 2 (them)

Team 1 (us) has to win the game by keeping all the other players trapped within team 2 (them)

Team 2 players (them) have to try to get into team 1 (us). This is extremely hard to do

Team 1 (us) wins by making team 2 players (them) think they’re part of team 1 (us) when really they’re still just another bunch of team 2 players (them). This is extremely easy to do

Team 2 (them) players pretend to win by creating other groups of ‘them’ (sometimes referred to as teams 3,4,5 etc) ad infinitum

Team 1 (us) strategies include…

Telling some team 2 (them) players that they’re actually team 1 (us) players, even though they’re not. This makes team 2 (them) waste a lot of time and energy fighting amongst themselves (teams 3,4,5 etc) whilst team 1 goes on to score

Team 1 players (us) sometimes pretend not to support each other, although really they (we) do. This is called ‘statesmanship’

G20 summit 2

Sometimes team 1 players (us) pretend to support some but not all team 2 players (them). This is called ‘politics’

Team 2 (them) only succeed by working together to defeat team 1 (us). In the event that this appears possible team 1 players (us) must invent further subdivisions within team 2 (them). It’s a rule.

Subdivisions created by team 1 (us) may include ‘the poor’, ‘the indolent’, ‘the immoral’, ‘people from the wrong religion’, ‘people with the wrong skin colour’, ‘people who think it’s OK to tell team 2 (them) what the rules of the game are’ (the people in this last subdivision are usually known as ‘lefties’)

Team 1 (us) scores when their (our) players make lots of money at the expense of team 2 players (them)

Team 2 (them) players are never allowed to score (it’s a rule).

Any success in scoring any point by team 2 (them) will always constitute cheating and the umpire must return the advantage to team 1 (us) in all such situations

Umpires are ALWAYS team 1 players (us)

In the event that any player from team 2 (them) looks like they’re about to score any team 1 (us) player can appeal. In this event the umpire (us) must always declare a ‘foul’ and return the advantage to team 1 (us). That’s a rule too

Sometimes Team 1 players (us) pretend to let team 2 players (them) score but only when ensuring that team 2 players score an own goal at the same time (this strategy is typically known as ‘we’re all in it together’)

The game ends in a team 1 (us) victory when team 2 players (them) destroy each other completely

Unfortunately destruction of team 2 (them) would mean no more opportunities for team 1 (us) to score

So the object of the game for team 1 (us) is to keep team 2 (them) fighting each other but without letting them destroy themselves entirely

The game ends when…. well actually the game never ends.

Rule bookUmpire’s note…

The rules are defined by team 1 (us) & can be changed retrospectively by any umpire (us) if any team 2 players (them) seem close to actually joining team 1 (us) or scoring in any other way not explicitly described within these rules.

In summary….

Team 1 is ‘us’. ‘Us’ always wins. Team 2 is ‘them’. ‘Them’ always loses. It might sometimes look possible for them to become us but we will never allow that. The game depends upon there being lots of them for us to score from. So the rules are made by us to keep them trying to stop being them and to become us. That encourages them to follow the rules set by us. Different parts of us pretend to like different parts of them to maintain them in different groups, each striving to become us. The rules demand that different parts of us keep shifting our allegiances between different parts of them to keep them from scoring (which is always against the rules set down by us unless accompanied by them also scoring at least an equal number of ‘own goals’). The umpire’s decision is always final. The umpire is always us.

Simple, isn’t it?

Umpire

Lonely hearted Biffers

We get a few trolls on the EBF Facebook page. We also have the misfortune of having to trawl our way through the mountains of written bile that fascist Biffers leave on their own Facebook page(s). And one thing is extremely striking…

They generally have few friends outside of the fascist community and few interactions that  don’t involve other Biffers.

Of course that’s not terribly surprising. Paranoid neo-nazis aren’t the most appealing people in the world. They tend to be unreasonable bullies who aren’t used to or even capable of seeing things from anyone else’s point of view. That’s why they’re paranoid neo-nazis.

BF lonely hearts club

So now we know why they’re so committed to Britain First. No other organisation would ever accept them and they have no normal friends because they’re nasty, paranoid neo-nazi scumbags.

Serving justice

Last month Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, Leader and Deputy leader of Britain First were issued with an interim injunction in the High Court. This forbade them from doing various things including inciting racial or religious hatred and distributing material by electronic or other means likely to incite such hatred.

They have continued to do exactly that,in spite of the injunction.

EBF imprison Paul Golding Jayda Fransen

Ignoring the ruling of the High Court is a very serious offence. It can result in several years imprisonment.

Exposing Britain First believes that the time has come. These neonazis have been inciting racial and religious hatred, radicalising ordinary Brits and generally causing unrest and division within our society for years. Now the time has come to stop them.

We call upon the courts to send a message to Britain First and other neonazi groups by handing out the sentence that these two so richly deserve.

Send them down!

Paul Golding Jayda Fransen prison bars jail

The power of hatred

There really is power in hatred.

Hatred isn’t just a mindset, it’s an emotional response as well. Hatred leads to resentment and anger, both of which have been linked to physical and psychological health problems and even to early death. Perhaps that’s nature’s way of limiting the impact of our species’ most destructive individuals. They die a little sooner than the rest of us.

neonazi zack davies swastika flag racist white supremacist

Hatred doesn’t only have the power to kill the haters though. It has the power to kill the hated too. Haters become so locked in their own sad, hate-filled worldview they come to believe all sorts of atrocities are acceptable.

Take the recent case of the neo-nazi white supremacist who attacked an innocent man with a machete just because of the colour of his skin. And as you read the article pay special attention to the phrase…

“…radicalized on line”

That’s why we work so hard to counter Britain First’s lies.

Hate yoda meme fear anger suffering hatred

Because that hatred has power.

Because that hatred kills people.

How would that be?

Sometimes it’s hard to see the wood for the trees. It can be difficult to know who to trust in the ‘information age’.

Everywhere we turn somebody is pushing their message at us. What to buy, how to live, how to look, what to believe, who to pray to, what to wear, who to vote for and who to trust. There are so many of these messages bombarding us all, every minute of every day that it’s confusing and overwhelming.

Dutchy & Folding speech bubble BF Fransen Golding EBF Trust me

If only someone could make it all stop. If only somebody could take away all the complicated decisions and make everything simple again – like it was when we were children. Wouldn’t that be good?

Would you like someone to hold your hand, to make your decisions for you, to make the world’s problems simple to understand and then to give you a ready made way to feel good about your part in solving them?

Would you like that?

How much would you pay for that feeling of simplicity, even heroism that comes from total support for a superficial cause?

How much would you pay to be able to ignore the things that don’t fit your simple, uncomplicated world view? Things like this, for example…

Methodist church apologises for widespread abuse

Methodist church house

Subscriptions to Britain First start at just the price of a pint and a kebab for Folding Golding. For that you get to convince yourself that you understand both the problem and the solution. You even get to imagine that you’ve ‘done your bit’ for the cause.

BF compassion EBF

How would that be?

Everyone loves a trier – apparently

The latest Britain First campaign is so silly it’s a joke. They’re raising a petition about a problem that will be solved well before their petition could have the slightest impact anyway.

EBF BF temporary mosque craven campaign 1

This temporary Mosque in yorkshire has hit a few problems from the locals. They don’t like the noise that inevitably emanates from a house of worship that is effectively a tent at the end of the road. Fair enough.

For their part the Mosque’s officials have explained that the delay in removing it was caused by unavoidable building delays at their permanent Mosque. They have assured the local residents that work will be completed and the temporary Mosque dismantled by the end of August.

Fair enough? Not for Britain First, it seems…

BF temporary mosque craven campaign 3

In truly undemocratic style they’ve launched a campaign to ask people who don’t live locally to intervene over this local planning issue. That’s not how local democracy works. Some local people have complained and their complaints should be taken seriously. They should also be balanced against all the other opinions and existing planning and legal principles affecting the local area. They should not be overwhelmed by a national and international campaign orchestrated by a group of Nazis whose only reason for taking an interest is the fact that the case involves Muslims.

EBF BF temporary mosque craven campaign 2

These people and their hate-filled, racist agenda are becoming more and more obvious every single day. We wonder why they don’t mount campaigns against temporary churches (there’s usually one or two in the country at any one time) or the sound of church bells disturbing people as they enjoy a Sunday lie in. Actually we don’t wonder at all. It’s obvious. Campaigns against temporary Christian churches wouldn’t give them an opportunity to whip up anti-Muslim sentiment.

We can’t imagine how awful it must be to inhabit the mind of a Biffer, day in and day out. There must be so much petty hatred and paranoia in there leading them to launch campaigns like this one. They really are more to be pitied than blamed.

When politics goes bad

We’ve all heard about political dirty tricks.

We’ve all been scandalised by reports of underhand attempts by tin-pot fascists in banana republics to silence political opponents. We’ve all become used to the principles of representative democracy in which people of all political persuasions are able to get their message out to let the public decide.

In a democracy it doesn’t matter that we disagree – we still have to respect the right of other people to say their piece. Of course there are limits to that. We’re not allowed to incite racial or religious hatred, for example but we can still say what we mean.

Imagine what it would be like if a British political party ignored those hard-won British democratic values and tried to silence their political opponents. Imagine if they did so covertly as though they were some sort of quasi-military intelligence unit conducting ‘black ops’. How would that fit with traditional British values of fair play?

BF covert intelligence FB 5

Over the last ten years or so British citizens have changed the way they participate in politics. No longer do we sit passively in front of our TVs or quietly accept newspaper editorials as though they somehow have a monopoly on political thinking. We use social media. This generation, more than any other before it has the ability to discuss, to dissent, to promote and to debate across the political spectrum. And our political opportunities are so much the better as a result.

Imagine if a political party took it upon itself to decide who should or should not have access to social media. To decide who can and who cannot be heard in British democracy. There’d be an outcry – and rightly so.

BF covert intelligence FB 7

But, of course – that could never happen here…. or could it?

Well – actually, yes. There is a registered political party operating in Britain that’s trying to do just that. And they’re doing it by underhand means. They even give their covert activities the feel of a military operation, dressing up their dishonest attempts to subvert the freedom of expression of British citizens with terms like ‘intelligence’ or ‘operation’.

Even more hypocritically, they are setting up false accounts intended to complain about other, genuinely legitimate activists whom they falsely accuse of having created false accounts. They even issued instructions to their ‘operatives’ on how to create seemingly plausible fake accounts, known as ‘sock puppets’. The fact that these instructions are laughably superficial and would result in obviously fake accounts isn’t the point. The intention is clear.

BF covert intelligence FB 4

And it’s not hard to understand why they’re doing this. They’ve tried silencing their political opponents in other ways already and although they’ve had some success it’s really not been very effective. As much as anything else their attempts to make people ‘go away’ through face to face intimidation or via Email and postal threats have just made them a laughing stock. This ‘political party’ is now understood by all but its most blinkered supporters to be nothing more than a bunch of thugs trying to mask their white supremacist agenda behind real politics. They promote a bizarre definition of ‘Britishness’ that none but the most racist nationalists recognize at all.

So they’re trying a different tack – one that they naively suppose might be more subtle than out and out, in your face aggression. But once again, they’ve got it wrong. Once again they’re just showing themselves up for the undemocratic, unBritish, unpatriotic, unreasonable and uneducated buffoons they really are.

BF covert intelligence FB 9

What would you think of a registered political party that so ignored traditional British values of democracy and free expression? What would you say about such a party if it tried to convince you that it was concerned about preserving British values? What would you think of a political organisation that just tries to silence political opposition rather than debate with its detractors?

We know how we’d describe them.

We’d describe them as ‘Fascists’.

They describe themselves as ‘Britain First’!

BF covert intelligence FB 8

Hat tip…

EBF gratefully acknowledges the HM Armed Forces past and present that do not like Britain First community for bringing this ‘intelligence’ fiasco to our attention. That’s what happens when real servicemen and women take an interest in tin pot Nazis who merely  dream of playing soldiers on social media. There really isn’t any contest.

HM Armed Forces past and present that do not like BF community

It’s truly impressive for a paramilitary style intelligence organisation to find itself infiltrated on its first weekend of operations, isn’t it?

No?

We didn’t think so either.

Following in the Fuhrer’s footsteps

Yesterday we reported on Britain First’s antics in Rotherham. In that post we speculated that Dutchy and Folding might be getting set up in preparation for Lewis and Slattery’s rumoured coup attempt. However, today they released a video of the feckless duo deliberately flaunting the terms of their injunction in front of Rotherham police and on film. Manipulated by Dowson or not – the pair really do seem to be courting their own martyrdom in no uncertain terms.

Just take a look at the video here.

This is clear incitement of racial and religious hatred. There are over 800 taxi drivers in Rotherham. There has never been even the slightest indication that they were all involved in the child abuse scandal and yet Britain First assumes (indeed actively says) that they are all involved – at least the brown-skinned ones.

Rotherham taxi 1 sh

That’s a deliberate strategy to stir up tensions and defame the innocent. That’s why they introduced their illegally posted video of their illegal activities (read the terms of their injunction) with the Islamic ‘call to prayer’. And it worked – the Biffers obligingly got the point and decided that the child abuse tragedy isn’t bad enough in itself. They need to beef it up a bit and make it about race, religion and skin-colour too. Dutchy and Folding must be so proud of them.

BF rotherham taxi racist comments

They think it’d be a good idea to copy Hitler and boycott Muslim businesses altogether. What a nice little bunch of fascists!

Rotherham taxi 4

Now let’s just be clear about the terms of the injunction…

BF High court injunction 2 detail 1

We think their behaviour both in Rotherham and online afterwards ticks quite a few of those boxes.

taxi racist bf rotherham

Remember the stuff about ‘encouraging’…

Rotherham taxi 2

So the question we need to ask ourselves is why? What do they think they will gain from imprisonment?

Actually it’s not hard to work out. Their ideological inspiration, the historical leader they’ve copied in so many other ways went to prison and in doing so became a martyr for the cause. He went to Landsberg Jail in 1924 for his role in the failed Beer Hall Putsch. Sentenced to 5 years he spent his time honing his oratorial skills (Dutchy and Folding could both do with some work there) and writing Mein Kampf (My struggle). He was released due to widespread public pressure after only 9 months. The years that followed his brief incarceration served him well, framing him not as the tyrant he was but as the misunderstood martyr for the German people.

But Hitler was a very different animal from Folding Golding.

Golding and Hitler

And Dutchy Fransen is no Rudolf Hess.

Fransen and Hess speaking

And yet they’re trying so hard to follow in the footsteps of the other Fuhrer and Deputy that there really doesn’t seem to be any other explanation. Dutchy and Folding seem actually to want to go down. Perhaps they think there’ll be such a public outcry that they’ll get out early, just like Uncle Adolf did. Perhaps they think that they’ll be set up as martyrs and become unassailable in the nationalist movement because of their temporary sacrifice. Perhaps they really are that stupid.

The truth is that very few people would bat an eyelid if they went down. Of those that would care, the vast majority would celebrate – not least Jim Dowson who’d be sure to make the most of their martyrdom to line his own pockets. Paul and Jayda can rot in jail for all he cares – he’s making money and that’s all that matters to an ideological venture capitalist like Jimbo.

So off you go then Dutchy and Folding. Follow in the Fuhrer’s footsteps all you like. Just don’t expect a happy ending. Hitler’s strategy didn’t turn out terribly well for him and it won’t work for you two tin pot fascists either.

We look forward to covering your trial and subsequent imprisonment. Someone put the champagne on ice – we’ll all be celebrating before too long!

Dutchy & Folding’s broken injunction

Deputy Fuhrer, Dutchy Fransen didn’t feel Dowson’s favour the way she would have wanted. As second in command over a fledgling fascist empire she persuaded herself that she really ought to be a bit more visible. Or perhaps she was persuaded by others who’d much rather see her out of the way. A certain Ms Slatter springs to mind.

Anyway – Dutchy did herself no favours in Rotherham today. She may have played right into Lewis and Slatter’s hands though. Not bright, Jayda. Not bright at all. What was that about not harrassing people or posting distressing or inciteful material on the internet?

BF brag about confronting Rotherham taxi driver July 2015

Folding Golding has been well and truly in the frame for some time now. He’s pretty certain to get the book thrown at him in the High Court next time. But Dutchy – she’s been a lot less active since the injunction. Until this weekend, that is.

Of course it’s possible that both the head Biffers might fold a little further when the dynamic duo return to court. They might try to pretend that they didn’t know what was happening. We think they’ll be on shaky ground if but hey, who knows?

Both Golding and Dutchy are banged to rights. They even provided the photographic evidence to prove that they broke the terms of their injunction.

Golding Fransen BF confronting taxi driver Rotherham July 2015

And just in case there’s any doubt that it really was Dutchy and Folding harassing that Rotherham taxi driver…

BF Rotherham July 2015 5 stooges jayda Golding newspaper

Now then – we thought it might be helpful to remind our readers (and Dutchy herself) of the terms of the injunction imposed upon her and her beloved Fuhrer…

BF High Court injunction 1

BF high court injunction 2

BF high court injunction 3

Enough said!