Britain First ignores the neonazi Swedish swordsman

This week we heard the terrible news that a vicious, unprovoked sword attack on a school in Trollhattan, Sweden had left two people dead and three more seriously injured. When the story broke little was known about the identity or the motives of the killer – simply that a maniac had entered the school and attacked both pupils and teachers, apparently indiscriminately.

Britain First, always on the lookout for a progaganda coup, responded quickly. And it didn’t take long before their obedient supporters began to take the bait. Dowson, Fransen and Golding have already pre-programmed the Biffers to assume every act of violence must be the fault of Muslim aggression. Britain First doesn’t even need to say it any more – just give the context of aggression and let their well-trained indoctrinated flock make the link for them.

EBF BF Darth Vader Islam sword attack Sweden school

The post was quickly removed from the Britain First Knight’s Templar International Facebook page once the reality became clear. Unsurprisingly enough, there has been no subsequent mention of it on any of the other Biffer pages so far as we can tell either. There are many pages under Biffer control, pages where they could have reported the truth, had they wanted to, including KTI (where the above meme first appeared).

EBF BF FB feeder pages meme

Britain First and KTI both deny that there is any connection between them but we know better than to believe that. The rank and file Biffer foot-soldiers may be too stupid to notice all the indoctrination and financial fleecing but the rest of us see it very clearly indeed.

EBF BF KTI link

far right sweden school sword killer Anton Lundin PetterssonBut let’s get back to the Swedish tragedy – the one that all the Biffer pages have become so very silent about.

Anton Lundin Pettersson, a 21 year old Swedish loner with no current or previous connection to Kronan school. He was a far right, neo-nazi who had fallen for the anti-immigrant, anti-Islam rhetoric of the ‘Sweden Democrats’, an extreme right wing political party. Like so many other far right groups, the Sweden Democrats use the same tactics of radicalising their followers on line and then sitting back whilst the sheep they have groomed go off and commit atrocities. So many of these attacks involve far right loners who are vulnerable targets for the likes of the Sweden Democrats and Britain First.

“He marches through the corridor with his weapons – a large sword and a large, sharp knife. He chose his victims. Those with dark-skin were attacked. He met with lighter-skinned people who were not attacked,” police investigator Thord Heraldsson told Aftonbladet.

Their gullible followers are like ticking time bombs with little more than a circumstantial link to implicate the neo-Nazis who primed them to explode.

EBF BF sword attack sweden ethnic immigrant muslim islam nazi far right

Their own predictable destruction (Pettersson himself was shot dead at the scene by armed police) makes it even more difficult to link the crime to its true instigators, the extremist far right propagandists who convince them about a war against ordinary Muslims, refugees and immigrants that doesn’t really exist.

BF implant bulletsPettersson left a note (now treated as a suicide note) in which he explained his motives. According to the Swedish police he had targeted those whom he considered to be ‘foreigners’ and objected to Sweden’s policy of accommodating refugees. His targets seem to have been chosen by skin colour. He had contact with several white-skinned pupils and staff at the school whom he left alone. He even paused for photographs with white-skinned pupils who thought his ridiculous costume, reminiscent of a WW2 German army uniform was some sort of Halloween stunt.

KTI BF EBF Texas militiaThe incident is just one more in a series of hate crimes that testify to the impact of online radicalisation by extremist right wing groups. Groups like Britain First whose behaviour (in common with other groups who encourage terrorism from the safety of their computer keyboards) has become increasingly extremist, inciting more and more violent behaviour over the last year.

But it doesn’t stop there. Over in the US, Britain First is currently working on a new type of incitement. ‘Knights Templar International Texas’, an offshoot of Knights Templar International which is itself an offshoot of Britain First (all of these are controlled by Golding and Dowson) is actually forming an armed militia to prosecute Holy War. BF’s British contingent is largely comprised of namby-pamby keyboard warriors but the Americans have a long-standing and very different relationship with gun-related crime. Texas, one of the American far right’s traditional strongholds, is fertile ground from which to develop a new anti-Muslim militia. Especially when the group floods their Facebook pages with deliberately fictional horror stories and out of context photographs in propaganda like this.

When we see the anti-Muslim, anti-refugee agenda that characterises both BF and KTI, together with the attempt to start real, on the ground ‘units’ of armed extremists it isn’t difficult to predict where all this is heading.

KTI recruit

It’s easy to pretend that the awful tragedy of Kronan School was just an isolated incident. But we think there’s much more to it. We think that Anton Lundin Pettersson was radicalised on line by extremist neo-Nazis. We think that makes this gullible young man just as much a victim as those he slaughtered in that Swedish school.

We think that Britain First and its offshoots are engaged in the same basic activity – they radicalise gullible people by convincing them that a war is going on where no such conflict actually exists. Of course, as much as anything they do this for money. They extort donations under false pretences, they divert money from legitimate charities and they sell exorbitantly priced merchandise (ironically, made in foreign sweatshops) but their pathological hatred for non-whites is real too. Britain First knows that their livelihood comes at the expense of victims such as those in Trollhattan but so long as the money keeps rolling in they really don’t care.

BF EBF islamic invasion syria trojan horse

The longer these people are allowed to continue spreading their hatred the closer this country will come to the next attack. We’ve already seen some appalling crimes, not least the vicious murder of an elderly Muslim man in Rotherham – an innocent local elder beaten to death by three young neo-Nazis whilst on his way to the Mosque for prayers.

How long will the UK shrug off these atrocities, be they domestic or foreign before we proscribe Britain First and the rest of their ilk?

We say – Proscribe Britain First now! Prosecute the extremist ring-leaders who are the cause of so much misery and destruction. Prevent further betrayal and radicalisation of gullible British citizens just to fill Dowson, Fransen and Golding’s pockets with the next 30 pieces of silver.

The rules of the game

Today David Cameron gave a speech. It wasn’t just any old speech. It was a speech intended to jump on the Islamophobic bandwagon (not that he’s ever really been ‘off the wagon’).

EBF Cameron divisive extremism speech the rules

When Team EBF read about it we despaired. This speech is just another blatant attempt to pander to the petty xenophobia and Islamophobia that pervades British society. What could he be playing at?

We’re sure that other people will have wondered the same thing. So we thought we’d try to identify the rules of this divisive game.

The rules of the game (Divide and rule)

The game involves two teams

Team 1 is called ‘us’

Team 2 is called ‘them’

Team 1 players (us) are allowed to know the rules

Team 2 players (them) are not allowed to know the rules (it’s a rule)

Whatever the score Team 1 (us) always wins

Most players start the game in team 2 (them)

Team 1 (us) has to win the game by keeping all the other players trapped within team 2 (them)

Team 2 players (them) have to try to get into team 1 (us). This is extremely hard to do

Team 1 (us) wins by making team 2 players (them) think they’re part of team 1 (us) when really they’re still just another bunch of team 2 players (them). This is extremely easy to do

Team 2 (them) players pretend to win by creating other groups of ‘them’ (sometimes referred to as teams 3,4,5 etc) ad infinitum

Team 1 (us) strategies include…

Telling some team 2 (them) players that they’re actually team 1 (us) players, even though they’re not. This makes team 2 (them) waste a lot of time and energy fighting amongst themselves (teams 3,4,5 etc) whilst team 1 goes on to score

Team 1 players (us) sometimes pretend not to support each other, although really they (we) do. This is called ‘statesmanship’

G20 summit 2

Sometimes team 1 players (us) pretend to support some but not all team 2 players (them). This is called ‘politics’

Team 2 (them) only succeed by working together to defeat team 1 (us). In the event that this appears possible team 1 players (us) must invent further subdivisions within team 2 (them). It’s a rule.

Subdivisions created by team 1 (us) may include ‘the poor’, ‘the indolent’, ‘the immoral’, ‘people from the wrong religion’, ‘people with the wrong skin colour’, ‘people who think it’s OK to tell team 2 (them) what the rules of the game are’ (the people in this last subdivision are usually known as ‘lefties’)

Team 1 (us) scores when their (our) players make lots of money at the expense of team 2 players (them)

Team 2 (them) players are never allowed to score (it’s a rule).

Any success in scoring any point by team 2 (them) will always constitute cheating and the umpire must return the advantage to team 1 (us) in all such situations

Umpires are ALWAYS team 1 players (us)

In the event that any player from team 2 (them) looks like they’re about to score any team 1 (us) player can appeal. In this event the umpire (us) must always declare a ‘foul’ and return the advantage to team 1 (us). That’s a rule too

Sometimes Team 1 players (us) pretend to let team 2 players (them) score but only when ensuring that team 2 players score an own goal at the same time (this strategy is typically known as ‘we’re all in it together’)

The game ends in a team 1 (us) victory when team 2 players (them) destroy each other completely

Unfortunately destruction of team 2 (them) would mean no more opportunities for team 1 (us) to score

So the object of the game for team 1 (us) is to keep team 2 (them) fighting each other but without letting them destroy themselves entirely

The game ends when…. well actually the game never ends.

Rule bookUmpire’s note…

The rules are defined by team 1 (us) & can be changed retrospectively by any umpire (us) if any team 2 players (them) seem close to actually joining team 1 (us) or scoring in any other way not explicitly described within these rules.

In summary….

Team 1 is ‘us’. ‘Us’ always wins. Team 2 is ‘them’. ‘Them’ always loses. It might sometimes look possible for them to become us but we will never allow that. The game depends upon there being lots of them for us to score from. So the rules are made by us to keep them trying to stop being them and to become us. That encourages them to follow the rules set by us. Different parts of us pretend to like different parts of them to maintain them in different groups, each striving to become us. The rules demand that different parts of us keep shifting our allegiances between different parts of them to keep them from scoring (which is always against the rules set down by us unless accompanied by them also scoring at least an equal number of ‘own goals’). The umpire’s decision is always final. The umpire is always us.

Simple, isn’t it?

Umpire