Britain First’s High Court chickens coming home to roost

It’s hard to know quite where to begin with this, most recent Britain First scam. We could go on at length about the despicable hi-jacking of the tragedy in Nice to fill Britain First’s coffers but really there’s nothing new there. That, after all is what Britain First does. Like circling vultures, the Biffers jump on every available tragedy and do their best to make it all about them – for a profit, of course.

We could write about the hypocrisy of Britain First in assuming the Nice killer was motivated by ISIS whilst denying any relationship whatsoever between them and Jo Cox’s murderer, Tommy Mair. This in spite of the fact that the driver in NICE seems to have had no links to Daesh or even to any practicing Muslims.

https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/762229527251890/?hc_location=ufi

We could write about the judiciary’s attitude to Britain First in general and the way that their apparent Teflon-coating seems finally to be wearing thin.

But we’re not going to do that (well only a bit). Instead we’re going to write about funding. This is the begging video that Britain First released following the Nice attack.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2BlblCXUOtM

As you can see it begins with Golding discussing the events in France before quickly shifting to his own begging bowl. Claiming a ‘new’ outrage from Luton and Bedfordshire police he appeals for £15,000 to fight a ‘new’ injunction against Britain First. There’s only one problem – it isn’t ‘new’ at all.

On June 26th 2015 an interim injunction was granted by the High Court in respect of this exact appeal from the police in Luton. That’s the interim injunction curtailing Britain First’s activities in Luton at the hearing that Paul and Jayda continue to pretend to have ‘won’. It’s a strange definition of ‘victory’ that produces such a far-reaching injunction as this.

BF High Court injunction 1

BF high court injunction 2

BF high court injunction 3

The fact is that Britain First have already raised funds to fight this particular case. And they’ve announced that they reached their target at least once (despite the sum’s omission from their published accounts). So why all the fuss now?

Partly they’re begging for more cash because that’s what they do. And partly they’re begging for cash because this may be one of their last opportunities to do so. Britain First has ignored most of the terms of this injunction since it was granted. The only clauses they seem to have stuck to are not entering Mosque property uninvited and not bringing crosses or their childish ‘No more mosques’ banner to Luton last June. They’ve completely disregarded the other two conditions (underlined below in red) and on August 15th their behaviour over the last year will be reviewed in the High Court. We suspect it won’t go well for the despicable duo!

BF High court injunction 2 detail 1

This interim injunction was granted pending a full hearing ‘at a later date’. Now, a little over a year later that full hearing is fast approaching. It will be held at the High Court on August 15th 2016. As you can see the case reference number in both documents is the same(HQ15X02820). It’s the same case.

EBF BF injunction then and now July 2016 June 2015

To put it another way, Jayda and the Fuhrer have spent the last year demonstrating increasing bravado. They’ve flouted the law of the land with growing (but misguided) confidence, presumably because as time passed they became more and more convinced that the case had just ‘gone away’. And Jayda’s supposed to understand English law!

Now the chickens are coming home to roost and the realisation of the risk they face has begun to sink in. This ‘later date’ hearing really might be the end of Britain First. It might be the end of Paul and Jayda’s personal liberty too (here’s hoping).

Not long now!

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Britain First’s High Court chickens coming home to roost

  1. I’m very pleased to hear that the case hasn’t just gone away. Nobody is above the law, particularly these idiots, who believe in good, old-fashioned, British justice, at the end of a rope. (What utter nonsense that is, ignoring as it does, 1000 years of legal history that has resulted in the right to a fair trial and the concept of, “innocent until proven guilty”. They should be glad to go to court to defend their position whereas, if their concept of justice was generally accepted they would be locked away or even deported. Further to this, I cannot understand, for the life of me, why the death of Jo Cox and all the recent racial atttacks have not resulted in a forensic examination of the activities of Britain First and their ilk. Just in the few days, it would take the police to examine their websites and Facebook pages what would be found there would move us several steps closer to the banning of a number of nazi groups, that are exploiting the present post-Brexit chaos. They should be ashamed of the torrent of violence against people an property that they have unleashed. How stupid can people be to think that a vote “to leave” meant vigilantes could turn on anyone who doesn’t look just like them? And what gives them the right to choose who should go and who should stay?

    Liked by 1 person

    • You may be rihgt. Equally, you may be wrong. It’s possible that this will be the one. They’ve already had the warning. They’ve already breached the injunction many times. Maybe this was the rope they were given to see if they hanged themselves. We’ll know next month.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s