I have suffered for my beliefs! After three weeks of managing not to listen to the blatant lies and misinformation of the gruesome twosome, the office finally managed to tie me down to watch the whole Luton video and Screechy’s latest stunt outside an East London Mosque. Having seen them and almost bringing up a particularly nice merlot, it occurs to me (who has spent time on a police drug and alcohol awareness course, learning the signs of people who have taken substances) that she does seem to be off her head on something be it a narcotic or rabid belief… or both. Anyway having been forced to watch these videos and also their totally obedient sheeple (how they fawn over the joint fuhrer’s) it again seems to me that they are rapidly becoming a religious internet cult.
How do I get to this conclusion? Well a cult is defined by the church as:
The way to describe a cult is popular in the secular media. From this perspective, a cult is a religious or semi-religious sect whose members are controlled almost entirely by a single individual or by an organization.
This kind of cult is usually manipulative, demanding total commitment and loyalty from its followers. Anyone see a similarity yet?
The video of Screechy outside the mosque is reminicent of those men and women trying to preach the gospel in town centres up and down the country. People who are totally committed to religion trying to convert those that think differently. These are the people I cross the road to avoid. However, being tied to a chair in front of the office computer by Prole and Kit with Screechy trying to scream to Muslims I had to take in what she said. Her bodyguards just stood there as she was spat at and shouted back at as she continued to preach a particularly vile gospel that she obviously had difficulty remembering. In fact, the people who kept the peace were not Biffers but Mosque security who managed to keep the young Muslims away from the rabid Screechy. It was she who was trying to provoke a breach of the peace.
The police turned up and tried to move Screechy on. First she said they were part of a legitimate political party, then a Christian movement and then she refused to cooperate with the police when they wanted to take her complaint seriously (lefteye marxist coppers hey who’d have them?). Then, when the policeman quoted Leviticus about not eating fish she went into overdrive (some would say drug fuelled). Obviously the Fuhress hadn’t read that part – or conveniently forgot about it. She continued with her rambling tirade telling the police that this was a legitimate street protest. The fact that there were reports of a school visit to the mosque didn’t seem to faze her at all.
The videos have given us at the EBF tower a few things to look at and turn over to the investigation team. So let’s go through them.
A) there are certainly pointers to Screechy being on some sort of substance: vacant looks in eyes; moodswings; and trouble remembering what she says.
B) In an earlier video, or was it a cult email or Facebook piece, the Fuhrers decided to play on the fact that the bail conditions imposed on them by the magistrates effectively meant that Screechy and Goldibollocks were under house arrest. Big Biffer fail! If they were how was Screechy in East London?
C) They have increasingly started to call those in authority left wing traitors (magistrates, police, Tony Blair) and trying to provoke them into arresting senior members of the Fourth Reich. As far as I could see the police in Luton tried to allow the remote controlled activists (did you see the wires?) to give out papers and speak to the Luton dwellers as much as they liked. They were banned from going into Bury Park to prevent a potential breach of the peace. Then when outraged residents of Luton (all white as far as I could see…so much for Luton being a white no-go zone) wanted the Biffers to fuck off the police arrested one of the anti’s and sent the rest, along with the Biffers packing with a section 35.
The police must be getting particularly pissed off with them by now. The police were also terribly courteous to Screechy in East London trying to get her to make a complaint. However, in her apparently high state she wouldn’t until later, when all evidence had disappeared.
d) They have become increasingly insistent with their begging Emails for various things, safety for activists (although walking sticks that are not necessary and gloves that appear to be a bit naughty seem to be openly held/worn) legal costs etc etc. This appears almost cultlike and their cult members (take members out and change the L to an N) lap it up and send off their hard earned (mainly American) dollars.
e) If they say “legitimate political party,” “Christian movement” or “lefteye authorities” one more time I’m going to puke.
There you go then another week of Biffers in a nutshell, very much looking like a cult with the leaders getting money and undying commitment under seemingly fraudulent means, screaming their gospel to be listened to whether you want it or not.
And now my profit is going to be down because of the amount of mindbleach I have to buy to cleanse my consciousness of Screechy and Goldibollocks. Please Kit and Prole, pretty, pretty please… I’ll be good from now on but please don’t let me have to see anymore Biffer productions.